Thursday, December 19, 2013

Duck Dynasty and "Free Speech"



My Facebook feed is abuzz with people who are enraged about Phil Robertson’s suspension from the A&E show “Duck Dynasty” over anti-gay comments he made in a recent GQ interview. Most of their outrage centers on what they see as an abridgment of “free speech.” Why, they ask, is Phil being punished for speaking his mind? We live in a free country, they assert, and Phil should be allowed to express his beliefs.



Well, you’re partially right, Facebook universe. Phil DOES have the right to speak his mind, but A&E also has the right to fire him for it. You see, only the government can get in trouble for conditioning a benefit (like employment) on you refraining from exercising a right. Private businesses, however, can hire and fire whoever they want as long as it isn’t contrary to some anti-discrimination law. Forcing them to keep him on the show would violate their right against compelled association.

For example, government employees can’t be fired for expressing their political views in an op-ed article in the newspaper, or discussing their religious beliefs at the water cooler (there are exceptions if your comments were somehow tied to your position, but nevermind about those right now). 

However, a private entity can exclude someone for almost any reason. A Republican store owner could fire his cashier because she’s a Democrat. A privately-run parade can choose to exclude gay activists groups from marching. This may seem unfair when it’s a member of your group that’s targeted, but the First Amendment also grants an implied right against compelled association-- the government can’t force you to associate with someone whose beliefs clash with your own, because doing so might alter the message you project and violate your own right to free speech.

Let’s assume A&E really does have a heartfelt commitment to promoting gay rights. If they permitted Phil to remain on the show, viewers might interpret that as their acceptance of his opinion. A&E has a right to choose which message it expresses, and that includes the right to fire cast members who vocally disagree with that message. If E! suddenly decided that it disagreed with the Kardashians’ promiscuous lifestyle, they would have the right to cancel the show. If you want to preserve this right, you have to preserve A&E’s right too. Freedom goes both ways.


So if you support Phil’s view, then support Phil’s view. Say that you agree with him, say that you support him. Stop watching A&E shows, if you disagree with their actions that strongly. You have that right.

But don’t lament the failure of our political system, because A&E is merely exercising the same right as Phil.